Think about getting ready for school. What do you do first? What comes next? Could you tell a robot how to do it, step by step?
Keep this light. Ask for two or three everyday jobs pupils already know (brushing teeth, packing a bag, lining up). Do not hand out the step cards yet. The point is curiosity: can we say the steps so clearly that someone else could follow them?
Key question: What would go wrong if we mixed the steps up?
Listen while your teacher shows the steps for brushing teeth. What happens when we mix two steps up?
Worked example first (do this before any new words): Say or write five short brushing-teeth steps in order (wet brush, toothpaste on, brush top, brush bottom, rinse). Act or point through them once. Then deliberately swap two (e.g. brush before toothpaste) and ask what goes wrong. Only after the class has seen both paths, label what they saw: That list of clear steps in the right order is an algorithm. The order matters. Say algorithm out loud with the class several times — do not leave it as a hard word to read alone.
Pronunciation cue: algorithm — "AL-guh-rith-um".
| Concept | Why it matters | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Algorithm — a clear list of steps, in the right order, that gets a job done | People and machines both need clear steps so the job works the same way every time | Brushing teeth: wet the brush, put on toothpaste, brush, rinse |
| Order — which step comes first, next and last | The same steps in the wrong order can spoil the job | Putting on shoes before socks does not work |
Teacher language to weave in (not a third board word): when we play robot later, we follow the steps exactly — only what the cards say, no guessing and no extra moves. A robot (or a friend playing robot) cannot guess what you meant.
Misconception to head off: pupils may think "algorithm" means a computer only. Revoice: everyday routines at home and school are algorithms too.
Look at the path on the board. Call out which step should come first, next and last. Your teacher will move the blocks on the board. Then we press run and see if the order was right.
Drive the algorithm-sequencer on the IWB in explore mode. Pupils do not need devices. They call out the order; you drag and run.
What is on screen: command blocks forward, turn left and turn right; a 4×3 grid; the robot sprite starts at the left of the middle row facing right; the flag is three cells to the right on the same row.
Known-good sequence (model first): forward, forward, forward. Run it — the robot reaches the flag.
Deliberate wrong sequence (debug beat): forward, turn right, forward. Run it — the robot leaves the path. Ask: What went wrong? Which step should move? Rebuild the working path together.
Optional longer path if the class is ready: move the goal idea in talk only, or rebuild with a turn if your layout allows — keep the first model dead simple so every child sees order working.
Fold the class in: when a few pupils suggest the next block, ask the others Do you agree? What would you try?
Link back to the everyday idea: the robot only does what we say, in the order we say it — just like a friend following our routine steps exactly.
In your group:
Print the provided step-card sets (one routine per group). Clear a small floor space for the play-robot pairs. Small groups work well (two callers, one robot), but any small group is fine — do not fix a hard number.
Set A — Brushing teeth
Set B — Packing a school bag
Success for Set B: bag first, open before packing, zip last, and all items in. Lunch box and books can swap in the middle and still count as a sensible order — several middle orders are fine.
Set C — Making toast
How to run it: Give each group one mixed-up set. First they order the cards on the table and agree the sequence. Then they stand and play robot: callers read one card at a time; the robot acts it with safe mime only (no real water, food or toaster). Role-swap is extension only if a group finishes early — protect the 13 minutes for one full order-and-run cycle per group. Do not start Investigation Journal recording in this step; that comes next.
Look-fors: cards left to right in a sensible order; robot waits for the next instruction; group notices when a wrong order makes the job fail.
Differentiation: offer a three-card mini set (get bag → put in lunch → zip closed) for groups who need a shorter sequence. Confident groups can deliberately put one card wrong, run it, and fix the bug together (extension).
On your Investigation Journal page, show the steps of your group's job in order. Draw a tick or a happy face if the robot finished the job.
Optional: if your group tried a wrong order and fixed it, you can sketch what you changed.
This is the paper recording beat in the lesson sitting — not homework. Hold up or show the Investigation Journal page on the board first so every pupil can see what they are using. Keep it light for 1st Class: numbered steps or a simple left-to-right drawing is enough, plus a tick/cross or happy/sad face for whether the robot finished.
Core ask for every pupil (two beats only): (1) the ordered steps, (2) whether the robot could finish the job.
Optional only — skip for most groups: what they changed, if the group tried a wrong order (extension groups). Do not expect a "fix" note from groups who ran the main path only. Say the optional line aloud only if a group needs it, so others do not freeze thinking they missed something.
Do not invent extra boxes or named columns on the journal page. Say what to record, not where on the page it sits.
Fast finishers: sketch one step they would add to make the algorithm clearer, or whisper-check another group's order — not an on-device task.
You're previewing this lesson. Get full access to this lesson and hundreds more — each one ready to teach, with interactive activities, printable resources and pupil progress tracking built in.