You already know that digital media can be cropped, filtered, trimmed and layered. Today the question flips.
When you meet a finished image, clip or soundtrack online, can you tell what was done to it?
| Your call | What it means |
|---|---|
| As taken | No good reason to think the capture was changed. |
| Fair editing | Changed for clarity, length, framing, quality or privacy, without inventing a false story. |
| Altered to mislead | Changed so people believe something untrue. |
You will make these calls from practical tells — clues you can see or hear — rather than guesswork.
Not every change is a trick. A sports photographer crops a wide shot so the goal fills the frame. A news desk brightens a dull flood photo so the waterline is clear. Those are ordinary edits.
Manipulation becomes a problem when the change is hidden and the viewer is led to believe something untrue: a sentence cut from a speech so the meaning flips, or a clip sped up so a calm corridor looks chaotic.
Today's three verdicts:
- As taken: nothing meaningful has been changed from the original capture.
- Fair editing: changes were made for clarity, length, framing, quality or privacy, and they do not invent a false story.
- Altered to mislead: the change is designed (or likely) to make the audience believe something untrue.
You will build a short tell checklist on the board as you work the first live item.
Work through each item in the interactive activity as a class. For every piece, look at what is on the board (caption, source, and the photo, audio or clip description), weigh what you notice, and commit to one verdict: as taken, fair editing, or altered to mislead. Then reveal the reasoning and check it against your call.
Argue out loud. The skill is naming what changed and whether that change invents a false story, not racing to a score.
As taken, fair edit, or altered?
On your own or in pairs, judge these two items. Look at each picture before you read anything else, then write three short lines for it.
| Item 1 | Item 2 |
|---|---|
 |  |
| Source: named local photographer Caption: “Quiet morning at the pier.” | Source: shop’s own post Caption: “New batch on the shelf today.” |
Verdict — as taken, fair editing, or altered to mislead.
What may have changed?
The one tell that decided it.
Compare things that should be different from each other: two of anything that look exactly alike are worth a second look. Check that light and shadow agree across the whole picture, and that reflections match what is above them.
Before you finish, check:
- a verdict on both items
- one clear tell named for each
- at least one item where you can say why it is as taken or fair editing rather than a lie
Pull the three verdicts back together.
| Your call | What it means |
|---|---|
| As taken | No good reason to think the capture was changed. |
| Fair editing | Changed for clarity, length, framing, quality or privacy, without inventing a false story. |
| Altered to mislead | Changed so people believe something untrue. |
The skill is not a perfect detector. It is slowing down, naming the tell, and asking what a viewer would wrongly conclude if they trusted the piece at full speed.
Unlock the full learning experience
You're previewing this lesson. Get full access to this lesson and hundreds more — each one ready to teach, with interactive activities, printable resources and pupil progress tracking built in.
This lesson is copyright of Coding Ireland 2017 - 2025. Unauthorised use, copying or distribution is not allowed.