The Classroom-Based Assessment, or CBA for short, in your Junior Cycle Coding Short Course is a way for your teacher to see what you've learned throughout the course.
Unlike traditional exams, it's based on the work you've done in class, like projects and activities. It's an important part of your overall Junior Cycle experience, helping you demonstrate your skills in a practical way. For short courses like this coding one, there's just one CBA.
The CBA is called 'Putting the pieces together' and it's the final part of your robotics short course. It's your chance to show everything you've learned by creating something with robotics.
You have two options for how to do your CBA:
Choose the one that suits you best.
If you choose the robotics project option for your CBA, you'll work in a small team of two or three students. As a group, choose a robotics creation to build, such as a robot, automated system, or device based on your personal interests or something you've researched before.
Here are the steps to follow:
Some tips to help you succeed:
If you choose the robotics portfolio option for your CBA, you'll work individually to collect and present examples of your work from the course. Select 3-5 pieces from across the different strands that show how your skills and learning have grown. You can include group work as long as you clearly specify your own role in it.
Here are the steps to follow:
Some tips to help you succeed:
Teachers use the Features of Quality, set out in these guidelines, to decide the
level of achievement in each Classroom-Based Assessment.
Exceptional Describes a piece of work that reflects the Features of Quality for the Classroom-Based Assessment to a very high standard. While not necessarily perfect, the strengths of the work far outstrip its flaws, which are minor. Suggestions for improvement are easily addressable by the student. |
The student demonstrates how they were fully involved in the project as a highly committed member of the team. The documentation of both the student’s learning and their code is comprehensive. The student demonstrates an excellent awareness of the ethical and/or legal issues they have encountered. The benefits of the project are presented in a very convincing way. The student has accurately recorded feedback and comprehensively responded to it. |
Above Expectations Describes a piece of work that reflects the Features of Quality for the Classroom-Based Assessment very well. The student shows a clear understanding of how to complete each area of the task. Feedback from the teacher might point to the necessity to address some aspect of the work in need of further attention or polishing, but, on the whole the work is of a high standard. |
The student demonstrates how they were involved in the project as a committed member of the team. The documentation of both the student’s learning and their code is very good. The student demonstrates a very good awareness of the ethical and/or legal issues they have encountered. The benefits of the project are presented in a convincing way. The student has correctly recorded feedback and competently responded to it. |
In Line with Expectations Describes a piece of work that reflects most of the Features of Quality for the Classroom-Based Assessment well. It shows a good understanding of the task in hand and is free from significant error. Feedback might point to areas needing further attention or correction, but the work is generally competent and accurate. |
The student demonstrates how they were involved in the project as a member of the team. The documentation of both the student’s learning and their code is good. The student demonstrates a good awareness of the ethical and/or legal issues they have encountered. The benefits of the project are presented in an adequate way. The student has recorded feedback and adequately responded to it. |
Yet to Meet Expectations Describes a piece of work that falls someway short of the demands of the Classroom-Based Assessment and its associated Features of Quality. Perhaps the student has made a good attempt, but the task has not been grasped clearly or is marred by significant lapses. Feedback will draw attention to fundamental errors that need to be addressed. |
The student demonstrates limited involvement in the project as a member of the team. The documentation of both the student’s learning and their code is limited. The student demonstrates a limited awareness of the ethical and/or legal issues they have encountered. The benefits of the project are presented in a less than adequate way. The student has recorded some feedback but their response to it is limited. |